
The American Spectator digs into Evangelicals for Mitt and says the "grassroots" blog actually is deeply connected to the Mitt Romney campaign.
Evangelicals for Mitt appears to be the result of the early efforts of Mark DeMoss, who operates a public relations company out of Atlanta. It was DeMoss who initially approached Romney, and who brought together many of the leaders of the evangelical movement in a meeting with Romney in Boston. From there, a number of evangelical groups began outreach with Romney. DeMoss has no direct ties to the website.
Today, the Evangelicals for Mitt operation has spent its time attacking conservative Republican presidential candidates, most recently former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and unannounced candidate, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson.
Thompson, who has made it clear that he does not support Roe v. Wade, and who was certified as pro-life by the National Right to Life Committee back in 1994, has continued to state that he is pro-life. But the Evangelicals for Mitt, using research provided by the Romney campaign, has been putting out information on its blog that Thompson, as well as other Republican Senate candidates, were not.
The Romney campaign has targeted Thompson as a serious threat to its ongoing political survival. Recent polls that have just begun including Thompson in surveys show him running ahead of Romney in Iowa, without his having spent a dime.
National Right to Life says Thompson has been reliably pro-life and his voting record sustains that view.
As for whether Evangelicals for Mitt is less-than-independent of the Romney campaign: The American Spectator didn't provide documentation but the EFM site hasn't denied it, so the jury is still out on that one.
As for Romney:







I have news for the folks who think that ol' Fred Thompson has been militantly pro-life throughout his career:
I was present at a speech Fred Thompson delivered to the College Republicans at Middle Tennessee State University in September 1993. When he finished his speech he agreed to take a few questions from the audience. a rather rotund lady stood up and asked, "What about abortion?" Thompson said something to the effect that abortion is a matter that should be determined by a woman and her doctor. While that's not exacly a NARALesque stand, it's not exactly the National Right to Life's stated policy either.
Let's not forget that Thompson's opponent in the August 1994 Republican primary, a nobody Christian conservative named John Baker, garnered over 1/3 of the vote, which resulted in Jim Cooper releasing a smarmy statement in which he stated that Fred Thompson was a "weak" candidate.
Posted by: Joltin' Django | March 26, 2007 12:41 PM | Permalink to Comment