
I don't know what the biggest domestic issue in American politics and the presidential campaign was when the sun came up this morning but I know what it is now: guns and the dwindling rights, thanks to liberals, of law-abiding Americans to use them to defend themselves.
The headlines are horrifying - at least 32 people shot dead by a mass-murdering gunman roving around the sprawling campus of Virginia Tech, which was, it turns out, a "gun-free zone," thanks to the misguided efforts of liberal policymakers who thought making an entire community a "gun-free zone" would make it safe.
Last year, a Virginia legislative committee killed legislation that would have given college students and employees in the state the right to carry handguns on campus. From the Roanoke Times news story back in January 2006:
Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker was happy to hear the bill was defeated. "I'm sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly's actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus."
But all they did was ensure that thousands of students, staff and faculty members at Virginia Tech would be sitting ducks for an attack like today's.
You have the Second Amendment right to own a gun in this country, but too many political subdivisions have taken away your right to self-defense, making you a sitting duck, in the name of reducing gun violence. It doesn't work - the Virginia Tech massacre proves that, just as Columbine and a long list of other shooting sprees proved it.
Every presidential candidate needs to be asked to support reducing restrictions on where people can carry a personal-defense weapon if they choose to own and carry a gun.
A single bad person armed with a gun at Virginia Tech killed 32 people. But a single good person with a gun could have stopped the shooter cold.
The anti-gun liberals will try to use the Virginia Tech massacre as a reason to restrict guns even more, even though restricting guns more won't work. Bad people don't follow such laws, while good people do. That's why 32 people are dead from gunshot wounds today in the middle of a "gun-free" zone.
The policy answer isn't to disarm more people in more places - it's to allow law-abiding Americans to defend themselves. Watch the candidates carefully as they address today's tragedy and listen for whether they support expanding or restricting your right to use a gun to defend your life and the lives of your family, friends and associates.







Good. Use this tragedy as a vehicle for promoting your political beliefs. I'm sure the lion's share of the responsibility for this lies with policy makers. Surely the best way to combat such violence is to simply give everyone a gun. Problem solved.
Posted by: Me | April 16, 2007 1:46 PM | Permalink to Comment